Position: Forward/Center
Height: 6’10
Weight: 255lbs
Team: Georgetown Hoyas
Stats:
Advanced Metrics:
Minutes Percentage (Min%): 60.7%
PRPG! (Player Role Point Generated): 3.3
Defensive PRPG! (D-PRPG): 4.2 – Exceptional defensive impact, indicating elite-level contributions on that end.
Offensive BPM (OBPM): 3.2
Defensive BPM (DBPM): 4.2 – Elite defensive presence, suggesting strong rim protection and defensive awareness.
Offensive Rating (ORTG): 111.9
Usage Rate (USG%): 24.3% – Plays a prominent offensive role but is not overly ball-dominant.
Shooting Efficiency:
Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%): 54.4%
True Shooting Percentage (TS%): 58.0%
Free Throw Rate (FTR): 42.0% – Gets to the line frequently, a great indicator of an aggressive offensive game.
Free Throw Percentage (FT%): 72.4% – Respectable, but could be improved for a big man who draws a lot of fouls.
Scoring Breakdown:
Close 2PT Shooting: 103-150 (68.7%) – Elite finishing ability near the basket.
Far 2PT Shooting: 24-63 (38.1%) – Decent mid-range ability but not a primary weapon.
Overall 2PT Shooting: 127-213 (59.6%)
Three-Point Shooting: 6-37 (16.2%) – Very poor from deep; not a reliable perimeter shooter.
Playmaking & Turnovers:
Assist Percentage (AST%): 15.6%
Turnover Percentage (TO%): 17.4%
Assist-to-Turnover Ratio: 0.9
Defense & Hustle Stats:
Offensive Rebound Percentage (OR%): 9.7% – Excellent second-chance creator.
Defensive Rebound Percentage (DR%): 21.7% – Strong defensive rebounding presence.
Total Rebounds Per Game: 8.5 RPG
Block Percentage (Blk%): 7.5% – Elite shot-blocker, a key defensive anchor.
Steal Percentage (STL%): 2.7% – High for a big man, showing good defensive instincts.
Scoring Production:
Points Per Game (PPG): 14.5 – A strong contributor, especially for a player who does not have an ultra-high usage rate.
Provided by cbbanalytics
Play Types:
Top 5 Play Types (Offensive):
Post Up: 25.6%, 0.967PPP, 70th Percentile
P&R Roll Man: 20.6%, 0.822PPP, 19th Percentile
Cut: 19.4%, 1.304PPP, 68th Percentile
Offensive Rebounds: 9.3%, 1.303PPP, 78th Percentile
Spot Up: 5.9%, 0.905PPP, 45th Percentile
Top 5 Play Types (Defensive):
Spot Up: 42.5%, 0.897PPP, 60th Percentile
Post Up: 23.1% , 0.486PPP, 95th Percentile
Isolation: 16.3% , 0.846PPP, 42nd Percentile
P&R Roll Man: 11.3% , 0.500PPP, 93rd Percentile
P&R Ball Handler: 5.0%, 1.000PPP
Impact Games:
Good: Providence 1/25/25, Fairfield 11/9/24
Bad: Creighton 12/18/24, UConn 1/11/25
Best Overall Competition: St. John’s 1/28/25
Background:
Early Career & High School
Thomas Sorber was ranked No. 50 overall in the Class of 2024 and No. 3 in Pennsylvania, according to 247Sports Composite Rankings. A dominant two-way big man, Sorber showcased his ability as a stat-sheet stuffer, excelling in scoring, rebounding, and rim protection.
As a senior, he averaged a double-double with 18.9 points, 11.2 rebounds, and 4.8 blocks per game, while also contributing 2.5 assists and 1.3 steals, per MaxPreps. His versatility helped lead his team to the Class 5A state semifinals, where he posted similar averages of 17.8 points, 11.2 rebounds, 4.2 blocks, and 2.5 assists.
On the EYBL circuit, Sorber played for Team Final at the 2023 Nike EYBL Peach Jam, averaging 10.2 points, 7.2 rebounds, 2.2 blocks, and 1.7 assists against top-tier competition.
Offensive Profile
Strengths:
✅ Emerging Stretch Ability – Shows flashes of a translatable shooting form, with solid touch in mid-post situations.
✅ Scoring Mentality – A natural scorer who thrives in 1-on-1 post situations.
✅ Finishing Efficiency – Elite at the rim (68.7% on close 2PTs), showing strong touch inside.
✅ Offensive Rebounding – 9.7% offensive rebound rate, creating second-chance opportunities.
Weaknesses:
❌ Inconsistent Shot Selection – Often forces contested mid-range shots instead of playing to his strengths inside.
❌ Struggles With Physicality – Has difficulty finishing through contact, frequently opting for off-balance attempts.
❌ Limited Post Moves – Lacks a deep bag of counter-moves, making him predictable in the post.
❌ Turnovers & Playmaking – 17.4% turnover rate, indicating poor ball security and decision-making.
❌ Lacks Vertical Explosion – Limited to only 22 dunks attempted this season.
❌ Lack of Shooting Range – 16.2% from three, making him a non-factor beyond the arc.
Defensive Profile
Strengths:
✅ Elite Rim Protection – 4.2 Defensive BPM, 7.5% block rate, and dominant in post defense (95th percentile in PPP allowed).
✅ Defensive Rebounding – 21.7% DR%, securing possessions and limiting second chances.
✅ Help Defender & Rotations – Excellent at providing help defense in the paint and contesting shots.
Weaknesses:
❌ Struggles vs. Physical Bigs – Has difficulty holding position against elite bigs (Creighton’s Kalkbrenner, UConn’s frontcourt).
❌ Lacks Vertical Explosion – Limited leaping ability affects rim deterrence.
❌ Perimeter Defense – Struggles in ball-screen coverages and against quicker bigs in space.
NBA Projection & Player Comparisons
Projected Role: Rotational Big
Sorber projects as a defensive-minded big who will thrive as a rim protector, rebounder, and post defender. His offensive development path will determine his long-term viability—whether he can expand his game into a stretch-big role or remain a traditional interior big.
Comparison Paths:
Defensive Ceiling: Robert Williams Lite – Elite shot-blocker and interior defender but without elite athleticism.
Offensive Ceiling: Bobby Portis Lite – Stretch-big potential with toughness but not a primary scorer.
Best-Case Scenario:
Bobby Portis – A high-energy, two-way big who can space the floor, rebound, and defend multiple positions.
Worst-Case Scenario:
Marquese Chriss – A skilled but inconsistent big who struggles with physicality and lacks a defined role at the NBA level.
Final Thoughts
Thomas Sorber is a high-upside defensive anchor with excellent rim protection, rebounding, and interior finishing. While he has the physical tools and instincts to excel defensively, his offensive development—particularly in shooting, decision-making, and shot selection—will dictate his NBA trajectory. If he can improve his shooting touch and expand his offensive versatility, he has the potential to be a valuable rotation big at the next level.
Analysis:
Overall Impact: 20/25
Sorber’s impact on the game is evident night in and night out, as he serves as one of the primary driving forces for Georgetown on both offense and defense. Without him, the team appears significantly depleted. If I were to evaluate the most impactful area of Sorber’s game, it would undoubtedly be his defense. He effectively anchors the low post, provides help defense against players attacking the paint, and limits the effectiveness of his offensive counterpart. Offensively, there is still room for growth. While he is primarily a post-scoring option, he has shown flashes of skills that suggest the potential for a stretch-big development path. Nonetheless, Sorber is a young, talented big man with natural skills that make him stand out and give him a promising trajectory.
Scoring: 6.5/9
While Sorber’s scoring efficiency is still developing, he has been highly effective in the interior, averaging 14.5 points per game on 53.2% shooting from the field. This is solid production for a player who primarily operates as a one-level scoring threat. Though still a work in progress, Sorber has begun to expand his offensive game beyond the paint, showing an ability to face up against defenders. This allows him to operate from a triple-threat position, which is critical for his development. If he can further refine his face-up mid-range game alongside his back-to-the-basket skills, he could evolve into a two-level scoring threat, adding significant value to his offensive versatility. While he may never develop into a true three-level scorer, improving his perimeter game would greatly enhance his overall effectiveness. Given the indicators of potential in his shooting mechanics, this could be an area of focus for coaching staffs at the next level, as expanding his offensive arsenal would make him a more complete player.
Self Creation: 3.5/9
While Sorber primarily operates in the post-up, his effectiveness in this area is largely dependent on self-creation. Often, he looks to gain an advantage by initiating a back-down sequence with a few dribbles. However, against tougher competition, he struggles at times with physicality, which can limit his ability to establish deep post position. Despite his desire to get to the rim, many of his attempts come off-balance, reducing his efficiency. He has also shown flashes of off-the-dribble scoring and passing, but these moments are infrequent. Overall, self-creation is not a major strength in his game. Even if Sorber develops into a stretch big, his ball-handling and dribble package are unlikely to be advanced relative to his peers. This presents two potential developmental paths—either he expands his game to include some perimeter versatility, or he remains a traditional big where post-scoring and positioning become his primary focus. If he follows the latter path, his dribbling skills may not be a major factor, as he would rely on advantages created for him rather than initiating offense himself.
Playmaking: 3/9
Sorber has demonstrated the ability to pass the ball and facilitate playmaking from the post. While his reads are far from advanced, they show promising potential. Posting an assist rate of 15.6%, he exhibits an ability to distribute the ball with intent. However, his decision-making when attempting these passes is a concern, as he records a 17.4% turnover rate. While this skill set is not commonly displayed by many prospects of his size, it is something to monitor if he aims to showcase his abilities on the perimeter.
Shooting: 4/9
When evaluating Sorber’s shooting, we can approach it in one of two ways. On the surface, his raw shooting numbers leave much to be desired—he has connected on just 16.2% of his three-point attempts this season, while his midrange shooting hovers around 38.1%. These percentages suggest that he is not yet a reliable perimeter threat. However, another way to assess his shooting is by considering his willingness to take these shots and the mechanics behind his form. Sorber appears comfortable attempting these jumpers, which is often a promising indicator for future development. His shooting motion is projectable, meaning there is potential for improvement with refinement and repetition. While I typically avoid making overly optimistic shooting projections, Sorber strikes me as a player with clear room for growth in this area. If he can enhance his shot selection and consistency while refining his mechanics, there's a strong chance he could develop into a more reliable shooter over time.
Defensive Attribution: 8/10
I would argue that Sorber’s most prominent skill at this stage is his defensive ability. He is comfortable covering ground out to the perimeter while also displaying true rim deterrence, as evidenced by his 7.5% block rate. Additionally, he is a force on the defensive glass, boasting a 21.7% defensive rebound percentage. While he doesn’t have the quickest feet, he effectively utilizes his length to cover ground and disrupt offensive opportunities. For a freshman, he is relatively well-developed and possesses the physicality to hold his own in the low post when called upon. One of my favorite comparisons for Sorber is Robert Williams, primarily due to his defensive impact. While Sorber may not match Williams’ explosiveness as a vertical athlete, his trajectory could be similar if his development remains focused on the defensive side of the ball.
Off-Ball Offense: 2.5/9
Sorber’s off-ball offensive game is primarily utilized in two ways: as a screener in on-ball actions or by establishing position in the interior. While this may not be the most exciting aspect of his game, it is important to recognize that his scoring is largely confined to within 10 feet, especially given that his perimeter shooting efficiency is currently lacking. As a result, he is not someone you would naturally project to have a significant off-ball impact. That said, this does not discredit his movement and effectiveness in utilizing both the pick-and-roll (P&R) and pick-and-pop within an offensive system. His ability to draw defensive attention on the roll creates valuable gravity, forcing defenses to collapse and adjust, which plays a crucial role in the offensive scheme.
Post (Scoring/Playmaking): 7.5/9
Sorber has a unique ability to cover ground with long strides, though this can sometimes get him into trouble as he overextends in the post. However, he does possess the ability to finish with both hands around the rim. When faced with tougher and stronger competition, Sorber tends to rely on finesse moves rather than brute strength. This could be seen as a positive sign, as he is developing skills that may help him at the next level. However, it also raises concerns, as he will need to adapt to competing against similarly athletic players at the next stage. Offensively, Sorber is always looking to score when the ball is initiated to him in the post, which is an encouraging mindset. However, to maximize his impact, he should work on developing a secondary strategy, particularly in terms of reading the defense and improving his passing ability. As defenses at higher levels will look to double-team him in the post, refining his ability to pass out of pressure and find open teammates could make him a more well-rounded offensive threat. At this stage, Sorber does not have a wide array of post moves, often opting for an up-and-under finish or a running, leaning hook. While he is not a traditional post-up big man, he still manages to finish at a relatively high rate. The question marks surrounding his athleticism may become even more apparent at the next level, as he does not project to be a dominant athlete. Because of this, he will need to get more creative with his scoring attempts. This is why I suggest exploring the development of his stretch ability, as adding a perimeter threat could significantly enhance his game.
Intangibles/Eye Test: 8/11
It is hard to deny Sorber’s intangibles and the impact he makes when watching him play. Standing at 6’10” and 255 pounds, he is a consistent presence on the defensive end, while also drawing significant attention from opposing defenses on offense. His strong frame provides a solid foundation for teams looking to develop him into a true center, which could significantly boost his draft stock as he goes through individual workouts for NBA front offices. While his athleticism and vertical explosiveness may not immediately stand out, he effectively maximizes the athletic tools he does possess. Unfortunately for Georgetown, Sorber suffered a left foot injury in mid-February, which required surgery. Since his absence, the Hoyas have gone 2-4, with a noticeable drop-off in rebounding and interior presence. Moving forward, it will be interesting to see how NBA teams evaluate Sorber, particularly regarding any concerns about his injury history and how it might affect his long-term development.
Complete Evaluation: 64/100